Shubman Gill Century in All Formats: Tests, ODIs, T20I, IPL and Domestic

Every cricket century tells a story. Some come under pressure. Some come in easy situations. Some changes match results. Some are just personal milestones.

Young batters today face a unique challenge. They must succeed in multiple formats. Test cricket needs patience. ODI cricket needs balance. T20 cricket needs power.

Shubman Gill entered international cricket in 2019. Back then, nobody knew what he would become. Some thought he was just another talented player. Others saw potential for greatness.

Six years later, the debate continues. Is he better in Tests or ODIs? Does he perform more at home or away? Which conditions bring out his best batting?

Understanding shubman gill century in all formats helps answer these questions. It shows us patterns. It reveals consistency. It highlights strengths and weaknesses.

Shubman Gill Century in All Formats

This analysis uses pure data. We compare numbers across formats. We rank centuries by impact. We measure efficiency. We look at venues and opponents.

No predictions. No assumptions. No guesswork.

Just facts from his career so far. Just statistics that matter. Just rankings based on actual performance.

Because in cricket, numbers eventually reveal the truth. They show who performs when it matters. They separate consistent players from inconsistent ones.

Why Format Comparison Matters?

Scoring a century is impressive. But how fast you score it matters too.

A Test century in 250 balls is different from a Test century in 150 balls. An ODI century in 120 balls is different from one in 80 balls.

Different formats need different approaches. Test cricket values patience.

ODI cricket needs balance. T20 cricket demands speed. IPL adds extra pressure.

Shubman Gill Century in All Formats includes 19 international hundreds.

But they came at different speeds. They required different strike rates. They showed different levels of efficiency.

This article compares Gill’s century efficiency across formats. We look at balls per century. We examine strike rates. We analyze which format suits him best.

Why does this matter? It tells us where Gill is most effective. It shows which format brings out his best batting. It reveals his natural game.

Some batters are naturally aggressive. They score fast in all formats. Some are naturally defensive. They score slowly but steadily.

Where does Gill fit? The data will tell us.

Let’s start with the most basic measure: how many balls did he need for each century?

Balls Per Century: The Speed Comparison

Here’s how many balls Gill faced for each of his international centuries:

Test Centuries – Balls Faced

Test Century Average:

• Average balls per century: 257.5 balls
• Average strike rate: 53.33
• Fastest century: 184 balls (104 vs England)
• Slowest century: 467 balls (269 vs England)

ODI Centuries – Balls Faced

ODI Century Average:

• Average balls per century: 105.75 balls
• Average strike rate: 119.17
• Fastest century: 78 balls (112 vs New Zealand)
• Slowest century: 149 balls (208 vs New Zealand – double century)

T20I Century – Balls Faced

T20I Century:

• Only one century to analyze
• 82 balls for 126 runs
• Strike rate: 153.66

IPL Centuries – Balls Faced

IPL Century Average:

• Average balls per century: 76 balls
• Average strike rate: 143.90
• Fastest century: 71 balls (104 vs CSK)
• Slowest century: 87 balls (129 vs MI)

Cross-Format Comparison

The fastest format for Shubman Gill Century in Tests efficiency is IPL. He needs only 76 balls on average.

The slowest is Test cricket. He needs 257.5 balls on average. That’s 3.4 times slower than IPL.

Average Score During Centuries: Going Big

Scoring 100 is one thing. Scoring 150 or 200 is another.

Let’s see how big Gill scores when he gets to a century:

Format-Wise Average Century Score

Key Findings:

Test cricket sees Gill’s biggest scores. His average century score is 138 runs. That means when he reaches 100 in Tests, he typically adds another 38 runs.

His highest Test score is 269. That’s 169 runs after reaching 100. Exceptional conversion.

ODI cricket also shows good conversion. Average century score: 125.5 runs. His 208 proves he can go really big in ODIs too.

T20I has only one sample. But that one century was 126 runs. Good conversion considering the format.

IPL shows the lowest average century score: 109.5 runs. He reaches 100 and adds about 9-10 runs typically. That’s expected in T20 format where hitting out is risky.

Conversion After Century

Gill adds 38% more runs after reaching 100 in Tests. That’s elite conversion.

In ODIs, he adds 25.5% more. Still very good.

In T20 formats (both international and IPL), conversion is lower. That makes sense. Risk increases after 100 in T20 cricket.

Test vs ODI Efficiency: Which Format Suits Better?

Now let’s compare Gill’s two main formats directly.

Test Cricket Efficiency Metrics

ODI Cricket Efficiency Metrics

Direct Comparison

• Frequency: Test cricket gives more centuries. 1 in 4 matches vs 1 in 7 matches in ODIs.
• Speed: ODI centuries come much faster. 105.75 balls vs 257.5 balls. That’s a format difference.
• Strike Rate: ODI strike rate is 2.23 times faster than Test strike rate. Expected difference.
• Big Scores: Test centuries are bigger on average. 138 runs vs 125.5 runs.
• Conversion: Tests show a better conversion rate. 25% centuries per match vs 13.8% in ODIs.

Efficiency Winner: Test Cricket

Based on pure efficiency, Shubman Gill Century in Tests is more reliable than Shubman Gill Century in ODIs.

Why? Because he scores more frequently in Tests. One century every four matches is excellent.

In ODIs, he needs seven matches for one century. That’s still good, but less frequent.

Yes, ODI centuries come faster. But that’s a format requirement, not personal efficiency.

The real measure is frequency. How often does he score centuries? Tests win.

IPL vs T20I Comparison: The T20 Format Battle

Both are T20 cricket. But IPL and T20 internationals are different.

Let’s compare Gill’s efficiency in both:

IPL T20 Efficiency

T20I Efficiency

Direct T20 Comparison

• Frequency: IPL gives slightly more centuries. 1 in 29.5 matches vs 1 in 35 matches. Very close.
• Speed: IPL centuries are faster. 76 balls vs 82 balls. But a small sample size in T20Is.
• Strike Rate: T20I century had a better strike rate. 153.66 vs 143.90. Again, small sample.
• Score Size: T20I century was bigger. 126 runs vs 109.5 average in IPL.

T20 Format Conclusion

Too early to judge. T20I has only one century. IPL has four.

Based on available data, both formats show similar efficiency. Gill scores centuries about once every 30-35 matches in T20 cricket.

That’s normal. T20 centuries are rare for everyone. Even the best T20 batters score centuries infrequently.

Domestic Cricket and Ranji Trophy Efficiency

Shubman Gill Century in Domestic Matches built his game. Shubman Gill Century in Ranji Trophy taught him patience.

Domestic cricket efficiency is harder to measure. Complete data isn’t easily available. But we know key facts:

Known Ranji Trophy Performance

• Played for Punjab since 2017
• Multiple centuries in Ranji Trophy
• High first-class average (around 70+)
• Strong domestic record before international debut

Domestic vs International Pattern

The pattern shows something interesting. When Gill played less domestic cricket and more international cricket, his centuries came.

Why? More matches at a higher level. More experience. Better opposition. Higher pressure.

Domestic cricket built skills. International cricket showed results.

Best Format for Gill: Data-Backed Answer

Now we can answer: which format is Gill’s most efficient?

Overall Efficiency Ranking

Why Test Cricket Ranks First?

Test cricket is Gill’s most efficient format. The data proves it.

He scores one century every four Test matches. That’s 25% conversion rate. Exceptional.

His Test centuries are bigger. Average of 138 runs per century.

His highest score is in Tests: 269 runs. This came as captain in England.

Shubman Gill Century in All Formats finds its peak efficiency in Test cricket.

Why ODI Ranks Second?

ODI cricket is Gill’s second-best format. One century every seven matches.

He scores faster in ODIs. 105.75 balls per century vs 257.5 in Tests.

His ODI strike rate during centuries is excellent: 119.17. Near run-a-ball.

He holds the record for the youngest ODI double centurion. That’s efficiency and achievement combined.

Why T20 Formats Rank Lower?

T20 cricket (both IPL and T20I) ranks lower in efficiency. Not because Gill is bad at it. Because T20 centuries are rare for everyone.

One century every 30 matches is normal in T20 cricket. Even great T20 players have similar rates.

Chris Gayle, the T20 king, scored 22 T20I centuries in 79 matches. That’s one every 3.6 matches. Much better than Gill’s one in 35.

But Gayle is an exception. Most players score T20I centuries much less frequently.

Gill’s T20 efficiency will improve with more matches. He’s still young in this format.

Summary Ranking: Complete Efficiency Overview

Here’s the final efficiency comparison across all metrics:

Key Efficiency Insights

• Highest Frequency: Test cricket (1 in 4 matches)
• Fastest Scoring: IPL (76 balls average)
• Biggest Scores: Test cricket (138 runs average)
• Best Strike Rate: T20I (153.66, small sample)
• Most Consistent: Test cricket (10 centuries spread well)
• Most Improvement Needed: T20I (only 1 century so far)

Closing Insight: What the Numbers Actually Show?

The data reveals Gill’s natural game.

He is a Test cricket specialist who can adapt to white-ball formats. His numbers prove this.

Test cricket gives him time to build an innings. He uses that time well. He reaches 100 and then goes big. His 269 proves this ability.

ODI cricket suits his style too. He can accelerate when needed. His strike rate of 119 during the centuries is proof.

T20 cricket is still developing for him. Four IPL centuries in 118 matches show he can do it. But it’s not his natural strength yet.

The efficiency ranking is clear:

1. Test cricket – Natural fit
2. ODI cricket – Strong adaptation
3. T20 cricket – Work in progress

This doesn’t mean Gill is bad at T20s. It means his highest efficiency comes in longer formats. The data backs this conclusion.

No predictions here. Just facts. Just numbers. Just efficiency measurement across Shubman Gill Century in All Formats.

Also Check:

• Steve Smith Centuries In All Formats
• Virat Kohli Total Centuries in All Formats
• MS Dhoni Total Centuries

About the Author

Karan

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts